Go Back   ISPINE.ORG Forum > Main forums > iSpine
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

iSpine Discuss Note from 9th annual Ortho conference in Chicago in the Main forums forums; Robert Nucci, MD, a surgeon at Citrus Park Surgery Center, gave a presentation titled "Minimally Invasive Outpatient Lumbar fusions ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2011, 12:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: oklahoma city ok usa
Posts: 195
Default Note from 9th annual Ortho conference in Chicago

Robert Nucci, MD, a surgeon at Citrus Park Surgery Center, gave a presentation titled "Minimally Invasive Outpatient Lumbar fusions and Multi-Level Outpatient Cervical Disc Replacements" at the 9th Annual Orthopedic, Spine and Pain Management-Driven ASC Conference in Chicago on June 10, 2011. Dr. Nucci discussed the benefits associated with performing spine cases in ASCs and described the far lateral interbody fusion procedure he has performed on patients in ASCs.

The main concerns surgeons have with performing spine surgery in ASCs are:
• The infection rate is lower than in hospitals
• There is less overhead cost and increased efficiency in the OR
• Shorter anesthesia time

To perform single or multi-level FLIFs, Dr. Nucci removes the disc through a small incision, inserts a mesh cage and inflates it with allograft bone. The average OR time for the procedure is 129 minutes, surgeon time is 118 minutes and recovery time is 180 minutes. The average blood loss is 141 cc and there is minimal muscle tissue disruption.

Dr. Nucci also performs cervical disc replacement in ASCs using an artificial disc. The average OR time is 92.4 minutes, surgeon time is 77.5 minutes and recovery is 140.8 minutes. Patients are under anesthesia for approximately two hours and experience average blood loss of 95 cc. He hasn't experienced any complications with that procedure
__________________
female age 45, height 5"6", 145 lbds, non smoker, conservative treatments failed, (7/2007) C4/5/6 peek disc replacements,plate & screws failed fusion,
(9/2008) revision with bone replace plate and screws, (10/2009) C3/4 stand alone peek cage, (12/2010) facet joint injections C3-7, (1/2011) rhizotomy C6/7 failed, Trouble swallowing
most recent mri (7/2011) shows ajacent level issues: right neural foraminal narrowing C2/3, posterior bulge indents thecal sac at C6/7/T1 no mass effect on cord.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2011, 04:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,405
Default Asc

Ambulatory (or Ambulatory Care) Surgery Center which used to be known as outpatient surgery centers and maybe still is in some parts?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2011, 05:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sierra Madre, California
Posts: 904
Default

Thanks Maria, I was going to ask about that. Around here they are called Outpatient Surgery Centers
judy
__________________










2007 ACDF 4-7
2008 hip , knee scope, hip replacement
2009 thoracic T-5 thru T-11fusion
2009 VATS T7-8, posterior only T11-12. removal of thoracic hard wear
2010 lung surgery
2010 T2-L2 kyphosis correction
2010 Kyphoplasty T-3, T-4
2011 Cervical osteotomy ,revision C4-T5
2011 Foot surgery
2011 Revision fusion T7 thru L4/laminectomy
2012 Hammertoe correction left foot
2012 Revision fusion T-12 thru L5
2012 Revision fusion L4-L5
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2011, 01:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: oklahoma city ok usa
Posts: 195
Default yes

they are called that i guess in most places.
__________________
female age 45, height 5"6", 145 lbds, non smoker, conservative treatments failed, (7/2007) C4/5/6 peek disc replacements,plate & screws failed fusion,
(9/2008) revision with bone replace plate and screws, (10/2009) C3/4 stand alone peek cage, (12/2010) facet joint injections C3-7, (1/2011) rhizotomy C6/7 failed, Trouble swallowing
most recent mri (7/2011) shows ajacent level issues: right neural foraminal narrowing C2/3, posterior bulge indents thecal sac at C6/7/T1 no mass effect on cord.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2011, 02:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,405
Default Ambulatory Care

I used to work in an ambulatory care center which was a clinic outside the main hospital that saw an outpatient population. Not that one had to be walking in because we had a fair share of patients that came in w/motorized wheelchair.

I don't know whether in most cities unattached surgery centers are called ambulatory care surgery centers or outpatient surgery centers.. I still call the Emergency Dept. the Emergency Room as in go to the ER now vs. go to the ED now. No matter how many times I see ED in print I just can't get into calling it that.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2011, 04:59 PM
mmglobal's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

This fusion technique sounds like the Optimesh fusions I saw many years ago at IITS meeting in San Diego. (International Intradiscal Therapy Society) They had a cadaver lab in which this technique was taught.

The mesh sac can be inserted endoscopically. It is then packed (inflated) by packing morselized bone. As I remember, the problem with this device is that the fusion rate is not that great. The implant may then function like an artificial disc. However, it is not very nicely controlled and can move, breakdown, etc...



Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2011, 05:02 PM
mmglobal's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

Multi-level outpatient cervical ADR is great when there is no hematoma. The consequences of this complication are so great, and immediate surgery is required to keep this complication from becoming a tragedy. Just because you can do a procedure on an outpatient basis, does not necessarily mean it is a good idea.

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2011, 06:49 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71
Default Quick and easy?

Well said, Mark. Just because U.S. hospitals are generally failing at microbial sanitation and doctors now must behave according to their bosses (insurance companies) doesn't mean the "quick and easy" is the best solution for the patient.
-Jeff
__________________
19+ years back pain w/ advancing disc degeneration.
2002-2 level lumbar IDET w/ Nucleoplasty (very unsuccessful; huge setback)
Three level lumbar Charite (L3/4, L4/5, L5/S1) with Dr. Zeegers in Munich, Germany: 2/25/05 (successful)
Two level cervical Mobi-C (C5/6, C6/7) 2/2/07 with Dr. Zeegers (successful)
Laser Facet Coagulation (left side: L3/4, L4/5, L5/S1 & sacral) 11/04/10 with Prof. Dr. Reul / Beta Klinik (significant reduction in remnant lumbar & sacral pain)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2011, 09:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: oklahoma city ok usa
Posts: 195
Default better safe than sorry

i would much rather be in a hospital if at all possible just in case something went wrong and i need another area of care.
__________________
female age 45, height 5"6", 145 lbds, non smoker, conservative treatments failed, (7/2007) C4/5/6 peek disc replacements,plate & screws failed fusion,
(9/2008) revision with bone replace plate and screws, (10/2009) C3/4 stand alone peek cage, (12/2010) facet joint injections C3-7, (1/2011) rhizotomy C6/7 failed, Trouble swallowing
most recent mri (7/2011) shows ajacent level issues: right neural foraminal narrowing C2/3, posterior bulge indents thecal sac at C6/7/T1 no mass effect on cord.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2011, 11:06 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sierra Madre, California
Posts: 904
Default

I would also rather be in a hospital. When I had my kyphoplasty , i had an overnight stay and my surgeon asked if i wanted to stay an additional day. The nurses told me he is the only doctor who does not do this procedure on an outpatient basis. I was glad.
judy
__________________










2007 ACDF 4-7
2008 hip , knee scope, hip replacement
2009 thoracic T-5 thru T-11fusion
2009 VATS T7-8, posterior only T11-12. removal of thoracic hard wear
2010 lung surgery
2010 T2-L2 kyphosis correction
2010 Kyphoplasty T-3, T-4
2011 Cervical osteotomy ,revision C4-T5
2011 Foot surgery
2011 Revision fusion T7 thru L4/laminectomy
2012 Hammertoe correction left foot
2012 Revision fusion T-12 thru L5
2012 Revision fusion L4-L5
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2011, 11:45 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 120
Default



This can replace most fusions and it is easier to perform and it doesn't have to fuse. It is available in the free world.

Neo Disk only requires four screws. It is minimally disruptive.

There are even better ways of doing it such as implanting it and then pumping in the silicone or a safe hydrogel. It will do everything a fusion can do but it will also do everything a real disk can do.

As to infections: There is no reason other than criminal neglect for even a single nosocomial infections to occur. They are 100% preventable. Greed and carelessness are why they occur and infect over 2 million Americans each year and kill over 100,000.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2011, 11:39 PM
mmglobal's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

I looked seriously at the neodisc. It has been around for several years and has not created too much buzz in the industry. Many of the doctors I work with are always looking for the next promising technology. The neodisc is interesting for several reasons, but there are compromises in the design that give pause.

I sure hope that the neodisc naysayers are wrong, but after careful investigation, I elected not to consider it in my case.

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2011, 02:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,405
Default screws

That's the part I don't like.. only 4?? Sounds like 4 too many to me. This is just me and my screws in my spine phobia talking. I realize plenty of people do Ok with screws (and not).
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2011, 01:55 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sierra Madre, California
Posts: 904
Default

Maria with all my fused spine , I have so many many screws from my neck to my lumbar spine. Good thing i don't have a phobia. 4 is nothing
judy
__________________










2007 ACDF 4-7
2008 hip , knee scope, hip replacement
2009 thoracic T-5 thru T-11fusion
2009 VATS T7-8, posterior only T11-12. removal of thoracic hard wear
2010 lung surgery
2010 T2-L2 kyphosis correction
2010 Kyphoplasty T-3, T-4
2011 Cervical osteotomy ,revision C4-T5
2011 Foot surgery
2011 Revision fusion T7 thru L4/laminectomy
2012 Hammertoe correction left foot
2012 Revision fusion T-12 thru L5
2012 Revision fusion L4-L5
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2011, 04:11 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 10
Default

Mark, was that a pic of the Optimesh fusion material that they use? It looks similar to the hacky sacks I crochet.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2011, 06:29 PM
mmglobal's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

Yeah, that is optimesh.
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.