Avoid Physician Owned Distributorship (Pod)

[ADR seeker]

The PODs are groups of physicians, usually surgeons, who agree to purchase implanted devices such as total joint prostheses or spinal hardware (i.e. pedicle screws, cages, and rods). The physicians in the POD profit financially by participating in the sale of medical devices intended for implantation in their own patients, thus creating the opportunity for them to profit from their own referrals.

Under the Federal Anti-Kickback Law, the financial inducement to use one particular brand of devices over another for the sake of profit, which increases with usage, is a felony. Although individuals offering to set up these businesses for physicians will claim they are legal and approved by the Office of Inspector General (OIG), this is not the case. It is fact that only opinions issued by the OIG, and NOT the interpretations of private attorneys to the contrary, are the opinions that count. The opinions issued by the OIG on this subject document that such POD corporations fall under existing Anti-Kickback statutes. Other laws, such as the Civil Monetary Penalty and the Stark Self Referral, are a set-up for potential criminal prosecution and financial penalties that may apply to PODs.

It needs to be pointed out that private attorneys issuing opinions claiming the legality of POD arrangements are not themselves subject to federal indictments under the Anti-Kickback statutes if they wrong. It is the physicians and hospitals participating in the POD who bear the liability.

Issues of concern also include the incentive or inducement to overutilize surgical devices by the involved physicians which could result in unnecessary surgery, such as multi-level fusions for the primary treatment of degenerative disc disease. Such blatant abuse of patient trust has been frequently documented by members of the Association for Medical Ethics, whose participation in PODs is a prohibition of membership.

Overutilization also increases unnecessary health care costs that burden our already strained medical reimbursement system. Claims of saving hospitals money on implants need to be balanced against the “volume effect” of such behavior, as well as the ripple effect of more surgeries with ancillary expenses.

Public pronouncements by the Chief of the OIG make it clear that indictments of physicians and their associated medical facilities will be occurring among those participating in PODs.

Medical societies are trying to educate their membership about the pitfall of PODs. The OIG is scheduled to submit a comprehensive opinion this August regarding PODs which is anticipated to tighten loopholes and declare the POD model as illegal.

In summary, the Association for Medical Ethics believes that participating in PODs is both unethical and illegal, and likely to ensnare physicians and hospitals in future enforcement activities and lawsuits. Because of this, physicians need to be wary of any such arrangements.

[mariareese]

I am too late to this topic! Anyway let me say something.. PODs may be an innovatory alternative to manage costs of orthopaedic implants for clinic, patients, and payers, but they are also bountiful with multiple legal challenges. Few days before, however, the SFC has taken an interest in PODs, believing that the use of PODs perhaps result in inappropriate billings and deception.

_________________
Office Hysteroscopy