Thread: DIAM vs ADR
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2009, 10:20 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

I don't believe that there is any spine surgery that even approaches 97%. I discussed the interspineous devices with a leading surgeon yesterday and asked, "Why have these devices not lived up to the promise we saw in them 5 years ago?" My layperson's understanding of what was said is that the interspineous devices are great for stenosis in old people who's spines are largely immobilized anyway. Most of the interspineous devices really limit motion are are often like fusion devices. The way they force the segments into kyphosis (forward tilt) reduces your lordosis and can generate flat back syndrome. Flat back can really cause problems. They used to fuse in that position, but abandoned that because of the problems caused by loss of spinal balance when you reconfigure it so substantially.

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote