View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2009, 04:48 PM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

John, what a bummer that your history takes you (I think) to where you were before the surgeries, plus the added damage of putting the Dynesys in and taking it out, plus more degeneration. The original surgery was done to correct a problem. What does the Dynesys surgeon say is the next step?

I understand the feeling that motion preservation technology will improve, but also wonder what is less risky... especially if one is talking about multi-level fusion as the alternative. (I don't know if this is what is being considered in your case.)

Note that some painful facets are resolved with ADR because of restoring disc height, realigining facets, restoring closer to normal kinematics, etc... Obviously, some will still experience worsening facet problems and I'm not sure the doctors know who will be who and each case is truly unique.

I'm babysitting a toddler now... gotta run... more later.

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote