Thread: Which Device?
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-06-2014, 01:02 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

The keel cut is only relevant if causes a problem. It can cause problems but only if the surgeon uses improper technique. If the surgeon uses improper technique... you are with the wrong surgeon no matter which device you are using.

My issue with the Mobi-C is the excessive mobility of the device. With both lumbar and cervical ADR, I have seen many cases in which the highly mobile devices are problematic, ESPECIALLY in multi-level cases.

I am more than 5 years post-op from a 4-level ProDisc-C and still have 100% normal range of motion. (I do have ongoing problems with my t-spine, but these are apparently unrelated to my lumbar (2002) and cervical (2009) surgeries.

Call me if you wish... phone number on the GPN website linked below. 8am-6pm California time only please.

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote