View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2013, 02:30 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

Judy, the ALIF is almost the same surgery as an ADR. The recovery is a bit more difficult because you'll have more restrictions, more bracing, etc... because you have to protect the fusion.

It can be slightly less invasive because they don't need to get a straight shot at the disc space like they do with most of the ADR's, so the exposure is a little easier.

Is there any discussion of XLIF instead of ALIF? Perhaps the difficulties of your case motivate the doctors to go for the anterior approach because they may be able to get a more solid construct than they can with XLIF... but I'd ask about it. (I'm not suggesting that this is a better option... just something to discuss.)

Remember... I'm not a doctor.. yada, yada, yada... take everything I say with a grain of salt.

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote