Thread: Cervical Fusion
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2007, 12:33 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

I know a lot of people with cervical fusions, some very successful and some much less than successful. A single-level cervical fusion is a good operation with good outcomes. Even so, for me, I'd choose motion preservation over fusion if I was a good candidate. Multi-level fusions really amplify the risk of adjacent level degeneration. I know many people with good short-term results, but 3-4-5 years later, they are having more surgery at adjacent levels.

Please note that ADR does not insure against adjacent level degeneration... it just reduces the risk. Also note that studies have not yet proven this to be true.

Good luck,

Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote