View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2010, 06:09 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

IMHO, multi-level constructs are not good candidates for mobile core devices. (Spinal Kinetics M6, mobi-c, mobi-l, Charite, .... ) If you search ispine for the words "tiddley winks", you should find my description of how if something pushes one core in one direction, it can cause the adjacent level cores to be pushed in the opposite direction. This sets up a configuration that is not secure and the problems at each level multiplies the problems at the next level. I've seen too many of these configurations require revision.

Please note that I have a 2-level Charite' with no problems. Properly implanted in a stable spine, they are fine. Unfortunately, it's too easy to have a problem with this configuration and a problem with multi-level mobile-core ADR's are much worse than the corresponding multi-level stationary core configurations. If you have this (as I do) and are doing well, don't look a gift horse in the mouth... you are fine. However, if you are considering multi-level ADR, consider the mobile core issue very carefully.
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org
Reply With Quote