View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2007, 12:40 AM
mmglobal's Avatar
mmglobal mmglobal is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,511
Default

Ally,

I first saw Isobar at the Medica congress 4 years ago. To my knowledge, it was approved in the US as a fusion device, but is not approved as a motion preservation device. It operates in a similar fashion as Dynesys, having pedicle screws (like a posterior fusion) joined by a flexible spacer. In Dynesys the spacer is a plastic tube with a stiff cord running through it providing tension. In Isobar, the pedicle screws are joined by a system of metal rods with a joint in the middle.

Besides Isobar and Dynesys there are several other systems that provide posterior stabilization with less invasive surgeries. I implore you to discover your options. There is no such thing as a 'freebie' spine surgery. No such thing as "try this, if it doesn't work, you haven't burned any bridges." Yes, there are less invasive surgeries that seem that way, but it is up to you do discover all your options before you submit to spine surgery.


Isobar, from www.scientxusa.com



Dynesys, from various websites.


Mark
__________________
1997 MVA
2000 L4-5 Microdiscectomy/laminotomy
2001 L5-S1 Micro-d/lami
2002 L4-S1 Charite' ADR - SUCCESS!
2009 C3-C4, C5-C6-C7, T1-T2 ProDisc-C Nova
Summer 2009, more bad thoracic discs!
Life After Surgery Website
President: Global Patient Network, Inc.
Founder: www.iSpine.org

Last edited by mmglobal; 03-02-2007 at 12:51 AM.
Reply With Quote