View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2010, 11:36 PM
fuzzy's Avatar
fuzzy fuzzy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 246
Default

Mark you are hitting the nail right on the head.

Doctor patient communication. !...could rule out unnecessary discography procedures.

This was my issue my dr. Derby but also other dr.s. A lot of mistakes can be made when you only spend 10 minutes with the patient after looking for 5 minutes at the file that stuck to outside of the door. Worse yet, having to deal with an assistant. Maybe if *you* are part of a patient case its a little different but many are by themselves and are not necessarily qualified to know what is appropriate during times of pain. I have run into several surgeons who simply use this test as standard precedure to pre qualify for surgery without properly looking at the case to determine whether a disco is actually warranted.

I don't doubt at all that this procedure has diagnostic value but I feel it is over used after insufficently studying a patients case, i.e. proper patient selection. Too often it simply feels like it is used simply as a safe guard against possible malpractice legal problems after a poor outcome. Fact is that this procedure does have risks, especially in cervical cases.
__________________
Nov 07: STALIF Fusion L5/S1 ACTIV-L ADR L4/L5
Nov 09: Prodisc-C ADR 2 level C 4/5/6

Last edited by fuzzy; 01-16-2010 at 11:45 PM.
Reply With Quote